Author Topic: Do The Manual Review People in 1waylinks know about Article Builder? (Read 1098 times)

neilashworth · « **on:** January 10, 2012, 11:19:34 AM »

Sorry Jonathan, but twice now in the last three months I have taken spun content directly from AB and put it into 1waylinks, only to have it refused by your staff. This seems crazy and is VERY frustrating as it costs me time and money - two things I have little of and two of the main reasons I invested into these two tools of yours.

Here is a copy of the reason my last article on NETWORK MARKETING was declined:

REASON DECLINED: RULES REGARDING CONTENT: Rule 1. Stay well clear of anything referring to religion or to subjects on the fringes of religious practices or beliefs. This means avoid words/subjects such as Yoga, meditation, any mention of religious icons or celebration of religious holidays or holidays that are celebrated as such in known parts of the world (such as Christmas, Hanukah, Halloween, Easter for instance).

Seriously..??

How (in anyones mind) does Network Marketing constitute religious practises or beliefs?

I have put a ticket in as is the usual case but if this is required each time I put content into 1waylinks from AB I have to ask what level of understanding or discussion is provided to the human reviewers who clearly don't seem to realise this content is coming straight out of AB into 1waylinks.

jj · « **Reply #1 on:** January 10, 2012, 12:06:49 PM »

Hi,

What also would have been good is if the reviewer actually pasted the line/s of text that they were referring too, as that cuts out all the guessing as to why it has been declined.

jmj000 · « **Reply #2 on:** January 10, 2012, 12:56:14 PM »

I think two users shouldn't be allowed to have the same avatar image... at first glance I though the OP was jorchav...

JL Forums · « **Reply #2 on:** January 10, 2012, 12:56:14 PM »

Built For You: Automated Niche Websites With Daily Unique Content!

JLForums.com Exclusive Special Offers

Rich K · « **Reply #3 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:58:14 PM »

I as well am having the same issue. I have had AB Articles that went thru TBS, modified significantly and submitted, only to be declined. I revamp them again significantly and have them declined again. I have just given up in frustration 2-3 times and had to generate and modify new articles.

I agree it is very frustrating and a significant time waster for seeming very little gain.

Rich K.

HoneyJo · « **Reply #4 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:59:55 PM »

Quote from: jmj000 on January 10, 2012, 12:56:14 PM

I think two users shouldn't be allowed to have the same avatar image... at first glance I though the OP was jorchav...

I think that on a regular basis!!

Been so use to the avatar being Jorge (jorchav), just assume it is his writings.

He has used this avatar for years, he does not mind at all that another member
is using the same avatar... It is just confusing to me.

HJ

snm · « **Reply #5 on:** January 10, 2012, 09:26:12 PM »

I also noticed this some time back and today I also thought it was Jorchav's post.

Regards
SNM

HoneyJo · « **Reply #6 on:** January 10, 2012, 09:52:39 PM »

Quote from: snm on January 10, 2012, 09:26:12 PM

I also noticed this some time back and today I also thought it was Jorchav's post.
Regards SNM

It is very confusing Shiv, we get so use to one thing that is what we expect...

There is one good thing about it though, and that is at least Neilashwort is not
someone who make idiotic post! It seems that many of his post so far are useful,
as are all of Jorchav's!

It is already almost midnight here and I am not the least bit sleepy, I would not
mind being a night owl, if I did not wake up so early...

You have a good evening,

HJ

jj · « **Reply #7 on:** January 10, 2012, 11:59:20 PM »

Hi,

The OP has internet marketing articles declined for containing religious content and you're all starting your own conversation about their avatar and another forum member.

Anyone thought of offering any help or advice?

snm · « **Reply #8 on:** January 11, 2012, 01:25:42 AM »

JJ,

Only Jon can help on that issue.

This forum is actually very helpful.

Regards
SNM

JL Forums · « **Reply #8 on:** January 11, 2012, 01:25:42 AM »

Built For You: Automated Niche Websites With Daily Unique Content!

JLForums.com Exclusive Special Offers

jj · « **Reply #9 on:** January 11, 2012, 01:51:05 AM »

Hi,

I didn't say they were unhelpful.

If you look at the post under my first reply you'll see that they have commented on the OP's avatar, and it has been thanked twice, and it's unrelated to the OP's problem.

And as you say, Jon is the only one who can help, and because no one else can help or even offer advice they just comment on their avatar.

HoneyJo · « **Reply #10 on:** January 11, 2012, 08:26:45 AM »

Quote from: jj on January 11, 2012, 01:51:05 AM

Hi, I didn't say they were unhelpful.
If you look at the post under my first reply you'll see that they have commented on the OP's avatar, and it has been thanked twice, and it's unrelated to the OP's problem.
And as you say, Jon is the only one who can help, and because no one else can help or even offer advice they just comment on their avatar.

JJ,

Do you have any thoughts on the subject that will help Neilashworth with his problem?

Your first answer on the subject was another question not an answer, nor was Rich K's,
an answer. As snm and later you agreed neilashworth's original question only Jon or a
reviewer in 1Way will be able to answer!

We as you are referring to those of us, who made the post you mentioned above, have
for quite some time been on the forum, also have answered many questions (and received
answers for many of our questions), all have been noticing the relatively new, very nice
and often helpful neilashworth's avatar is the same one used by one of our long time and
extremely helpful member’s jorchav.

The fact that jmj000's first post in reference to same avatars being used by two different
members has been thanked twice shows that these post were appreciated and would
like this to be considered by an authoritative member of the forum.

If our bringing it up and making comments about it has been a problem for you I am sorry,
moreover, I am sure that snm and jmj000 will agree. We did not mean to offend you.

HoneyJo

Jonathan Leger · « **Reply #11 on:** January 11, 2012, 09:37:31 AM »

There is no guarantee that AB content will pass a 1wl review without modification. Though they have the same basic standards of content, people aren't perfect and stuff can slip through. You are responsible for making sure the content you submit to 1wl fits the requirements.

jj · « **Reply #12 on:** January 11, 2012, 10:27:55 AM »

Quote from: HoneyJo on January 11, 2012, 08:26:45 AM

JJ,

Do you have any thoughts on the subject that will help Neilashworth with his problem?

Hi,

Yes I do, and that is what I said in my first reply. It is not in any way a question. I suggested that the reviewer highlight the piece of text that has caused it to be declined, and that way the OP would not have any reason to come to this forum asking why an article about network marketing was declined because it is religious. And after all the comments we are no nearer to finding out why it got declined.

There must be a list of banned words somewhere, and one of them could be in that article even though it's about network marketing. And if that was highlighted it would have helped the OP.

Not only would it help the OP but it saves the article being reviewed and declined again if the OP misses the banned word/words again when they resubmit it. Jonathan pays their wages, and if he is happy to pay someone to keep on reviewing articles for banned words the author cannot see then that is up to him.

You also read a lot into posts that aren't actually written.

At what point do you thing I though I was being offended? You would have to say something to me directly to offend me.

It would have been more constructive if everyone concentrated on the problem the OP had rather than comment because they have an avatar the same as someone you all know. If it was the same as someone elses who you didn't know then my comment would have been followed up by Jonathan's comment.

Meg · « **Reply #13 on:** January 11, 2012, 10:38:58 AM »

Quote from: jmj000 on January 10, 2012, 12:56:14 PM

I think two users shouldn't be allowed to have the same avatar image... at first glance I though the OP was jorchav...

http://jlforums.com/advanced-features-of-this-forum/could-avatars-be-'unique'/msg43988/#msg43988

HoneyJo · « **Reply #14 on:** January 11, 2012, 01:15:17 PM »

Quote from: jj on January 11, 2012, 10:27:55 AM

You also read a lot into posts that aren't actually written. At what point do you thing I though I was being offended? You would have to say something to me directly to offend me.
It would have been more constructive if everyone concentrated on the problem the OP had rather than comment because they have an avatar the same as someone you all know. If it was the same as someone elses who you didn't know then my comment would have been followed up by Jonathan's comment.

JJ,

I read nothing into your comment!

Your first comment was based on a 'WHAT IF', your 2nd, 3rd, and 4th have all been criticism of other
forum members. 'Do you see any comparison in that to several of us bringing up duplicate avatars
in a thread that they are more than likely inappropriate'?

Furthermore, none of us have an objection to Neil Ashworth and Jorge Chavez having the same avatar,
as you implied!

So far, I have seen no post of Neil Ashworth that were not positive and beneficial to the forum members,
he is no longer a newbie on the forum and not someone we do not know! It is obvious that he is going
to be very valuable to the forum.

We simply consider it confusing, as many members are recognized very quickly by their avatar.

As to Jon answering immediately, good luck with that! Jon has so many people requesting his immediate
and personal answers it is surprising that he has to to develop programs for us! He answers all direct
questions WHEN HIS TIME ALLOWS!

That is why there are many forum members who attempt to give answers to questions that he may or
may not get to until next week. Almost every member of the forum realizes that his time is to valuable
for him to answer each question individually!

We also on occasion, simple tell the person with a problem that Jon, Meg or someone else that knows
more about a particular subject will be along shortly and help them. That is simply to let them know that
their post is being read and help is on the way..

If no-one has a helpful answer, JON will answer the question, often by the time he gets to read the thread
someone has given the correct answer - saving Jon time!

As for me, 'This thread is over!' I see no need in continuing to defend myself or other forum members.

HoneyJo

JL Forums

News: