Thanks for your responses so far guys! Much appreciated
For campaigns, that was a term used in in this thread:
"How to succeed with 1WayLinks.net"
http://jlforums.com/1waylinks-net/how-to-succeed-with-1waylinks-net/supersi's response:
"Now I am using 100 per month (per campaign/article). I used to use 250 each month, but after some testing actually got better results by using less. Maybe 250 in 30 days is too many, too quickly. I am still testing this out, but in the past 2 months have seen better progress in rankings using only 100 per month. I would love to hear feedback from other members regarding this. "supersi also has a link in his sig to a great free document:
"How To Succeed With 1WayLinks"
http://www.onewaylinkbuilding.net/01/1WL-Success.zipIn it he states:
"In my experience the more posts, the better. The number of posts I use and recommend you to use is 600 posts per month, per campaign. I have tested this extensively and consistently found that more posts are far superior in producing results in ranking as compared to fewer posts."Which is different than what he posted ... so that's why my questions were
1) Please define campaign? Wasn't sure what that meant (I thought it was a 1WL term). Is one site = one campaign?
If campaign is not a 1WL term, maybe someone can just outline a strategy they've been using that has worked for them?
2) So what is better: 200 or 600 or ...?
Because I can see right now just to do one campaign of 600 posts I'd need to buy a membership (250) and then get seven blogs up to get up to 600 posts..and that's just for one "campaign". What if I want to run three campaigns? Then I need another 24 blogs up. And that's why I had the next question of what's the cheapest way people are using to get additional blogs up?
Just trying to get my head wrapped around the cost involved for wanting to get links back to 20 sites.
Thanks again in advance for clarification!