JL Forums

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - cyber49

Pages: 1
Why is it that for all of Jon's products, he does not strip out the Paydotcom affiliate referral ID after landing on a link?

I even submitted a support ticket, and got no satisfactory answer, only that "they are not doing that", which is really irritating. 

The urls leave this code after the domain landing page, leaving the link open to ridicule by others as an obvious affiliate link, or worse, open to commission theft by someone inserting a different user id.


It's the primary reason why at least three people I know just won't promote his stuff as affiliates. They use it - they love it - but wont promote it because this looks really cheezy, like a schlocky Clickbank product. 

I've been in affiliate marketing a long time and this is one of the things everyone hates about most Clickbank merchants, that they're either too unskilled or simply too lazy to strip that out.

I'm more than a little disappointed to still see the same thing on ALL of Jons great products, and I KNOW it's not for lack of skill, or the fact that he's unaware of the importance, so what's the deal?
Jon, wont you reconsider and PLEASE pull those ID's out of your affiliate links? 

The Best Spinner 2 / Re: Does any user support exist for this program?
« on: September 17, 2010, 10:23:10 AM »
... but with Miss TBS's site you may can research and find your
solution. She is a user not the developer.

Also, the lessons and her records are very well organized on her site, which could
help you.


well this sounds great - but would it kill you to include a link!?  A forum Search for Miss TBS turns up nothing but this post...
Aha here it is, for those that need it... like me!  http://www.getmemotivated.co.uk/spin/

Keyword Snatcher (OLD VERSION) / Re: Will you ever open the door again?
« on: August 16, 2010, 11:20:34 AM »
Although i own it, this product is not in use for me, because there is no negative filtering. It's great, but pretty unmanageable, since you end up with so much stuff you'd rather not have to deal with. If they do re-release, I think it should only be after filtering is added...

I love the software, but it's so thorough and does such a good job, that we REALLY need some filtering possible. Any other users agree? If so, please express yourself here - http://jlforums.com/keyword-snatcher/negative-filtering-feature-possible/ because it's the only way we'll get the feature added.

Even though it's not for sale anymore, I think Jonathan will add the feature if enough people are interested.  Personally, I've cut way back on using it, because cleaning it up into something meaningful takes so long... ;(

After generating a 3000+ phrase result from a root phrase, i cant help thinking what a time saver it would to be able to exclude certain phrases from the end result. For example, getting a list of phrases for the root word "king" that doesn't include "kong" or "clubs", "hearts", "spades" or "diamonds"  - Any plans for filtering exclusions in the future?  Great app, like everything else you do...  ;)


Pages: 1